Existing customer offers betting in 2026: what they cost the punter

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

27 October 2026 · Verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register and the LCCP social responsibility code

A free bet that pays £30 when £5 is staked looks like a 600 per cent uplift. It is not. The Gambling Commission took effect on 19 January 2026 a promotion regime that limits how much wagering a betting bonus can be asked to do, and that bans an offer from asking the same customer to gamble across two or more product types. The change has made the welcome market tighter than it was, and it has sharpened the difference between a free bet that pays back what it wins and one whose headline number hides a turnover several times the bonus. Most of the brands reviewed below fall into the first group: a free bet whose stake is not returned, a minimum odds on the qualifying wager, a 7-day clock to use the credit and no casino to clear it on. That is the kind of offer the marketing pictures; the rules underneath it are what this page is about, because the rules are where the punter pays for the headline.

The page follows the angle of cost. A free bet is worth what it pays back in real money, not what its headline states, and a bonus whose turnover is “x10” of £40 turns a £40 credit into £400 of qualifying bets that must clear before any withdrawal. Across ten UK-licensed bookmakers, the gap between the headline and what the offer really costs the customer is the comparison that matters: minimum odds on the free bet, expiry window, whether a casino product is bundled in, whether the stake comes back, and the size of the boost when one is offered. The arithmetic that follows in the prescribed calculation puts that gap into one number.

The cost of a free bet, before a ball is kicked

The free bet is the offer that dominates this market. In its clean form a bookmaker credits a stake — £10, £20, £40 — after the customer has placed a real-money first bet at a stated minimum price. The credited stake cannot itself be wagered again as cash and is removed if it loses; only the winnings carry through to the withdrawable balance. That is the convention that turns “£40 in free bets” into something closer to its real value, and that the return calculation in the section on the bonus turnover exercises does the sums on.

The minimum price on the free bet is the second lever. Most of the offers below name a floor of 2.0 (1/1) on the free bet itself or on the qualifying wager, and a few name 1/2 (1.50). A floor that low lets the punter place a near-certainty, which sounds generous but compresses the winnings when it lands; a floor at evens pays back roughly twice the free bet at full strength, and at 1/2 a touch over half. The expiry window sits next to the floor. Seven days is the usual shelf life on a free bet from credit, with one or two standing at shorter. A punter who places the credit on the day it is credited pays no penalty for the deadline; a punter who leaves it on the wallet for a long weekend is gambling on finding a price they like in a market that has not moved.

What a free bet is “worth” is the average payout over many uses, not the headline number. The formula applied in the calculation section below turns a free bet of £30 at minimum odds 2.0 and a market margin of 5 per cent into a real-money expected value of around £14, before the qualifying stake the offer usually demands. That is the work the marketing line skips: it announces the credit, it does not announce the value.

The mechanics of a bonus: turnover, minimum price, expiry

A bonus is a credit that is added to a withdrawable balance only after the customer has wagered a multiple of it. The Commission cap in force since 19 January 2026 limits that multiple to no more than ten times the bonus, and bans any offer that ties the bonus to gambling on two or more product types. The cap does not erase the turnover requirement — it caps it. A bonus of £40 at the cap is still £400 of qualifying bets, and at the more typical multiples lower in the table the figure is smaller but the qualification is the same shape: place the qualifying bets at or above the stated minimum odds, within the allowed days, then the bonus drops into the withdrawable balance.

The conditions travel as a package: turnover, minimum odds, expiry and a contribution list that says which market types count in full and which count at half or not at all. Some offers exclude combination bets, others exclude each-way bets, a few exclude in-play. The punter’s job is to read the contribution list before placing a bet that does not count, because a bet that does not count towards turnover is a bet that has to be replaced.

The mixed-product ban is the line that most affects how the welcome offer looks now. Under it, “bet £20 on football, get 50 free spins” is no longer a permitted offer — the casino product cannot be attached to the betting trigger, and the free spins, if any, must be earned on their own terms in their own product. That cuts a marketing bridge between the sportsbook and the casino that several brands used to use; the customer who is interested in both now has two offers to clear, not one.

The Responsible Gambling frame: checks, registers and the customer’s lever

UK-licensed bookmakers operate inside a player-protection regime that the reader who is comparing offers does not see on the welcome page. Three of its parts change what an offer costs in time and friction. Identity verification runs before the first deposit and the first bet, including with a free bet or a bonus; the customer cannot place a wager without a name, address and date of birth on file. The financial vulnerability check applies once net deposits exceed £150 in a rolling 30 days, and is a public-record check rather than a credit or income check; the financial risk assessment the press calls “affordability checks” has been announced in a staged plan with no start date, and is not in force as a hard threshold yet. Deposit limits are the customer’s lever: every licensed operator offers a fixed-period gross deposit limit, set by the customer, and the choice belongs to the reader.

GAMSTOP is the multi-operator self-exclusion scheme, a mandatory licence condition for online operators since 31 March 2020. A punter who has registered with GAMSTOP cannot open a new account at any UK-licensed online bookmaker for the chosen period — six months, one year, five years, or five years with auto-renewal — and the exclusion then stays in place for a further seven years unless the customer asks GAMSTOP to remove it. Betting shops run on a separate scheme, not GAMSTOP. Help outside the operator is GamCare, the National Gambling Helpline, GambleAware and the NHS gambling clinics, and the customer who feels the offer is pulling them further than they want to go can use any of them without telling the bookmaker.

The frame is part of the cost of a free bet because it is part of how a free bet is offered. A brand that verifies identity, runs vulnerability checks at the set thresholds and is on GAMSTOP is the brand the reader can complain to through the Commission if the offer goes wrong. A brand outside that frame offers a higher headline at the price of no Commission route and no GAMSTOP coverage, and the lost protection is the cost the marketing line does not state.

The landscape of bookmaker offers in 2026

The ten brands below are all on the Commission’s public register against a remote general betting licence for real events, and every one is a GAMSTOP member. Several run as part of a group — Coral and Ladbrokes under LC International Limited is the relevant pair in this set — so the comparison reads as a comparison of brands, not of distinct corporate offers. The set is not the whole market; the Commission lists more licensed operators than any review covers, and a brand not in this set is not necessarily unlicensed, only not featured.

What follows is the comparison the reader came for. The table closes the broad facts — the licence number, the holder, and what the operator’s own terms state about a free bet, a bonus or a price boost — and the write-ups under it pull the picture back from the table to the reader’s situation: which book to use when a small budget cannot survive a long turnover, which book to use when the bonus shape is the attraction, which book to drop because the headline number is a poorer offer than it looks. The angle of cost runs through the table into the write-ups, and into the calculation that exercises the cap on a worked example.

Brand licence and offer terms at a glance

The columns do not cover everything the comparison could ask of a brand. They cover what the headline of the offer says and where to check the licence, because that is what the reader can act on first. Payment depth, market margin per event and live-streaming coverage are operator-specific and best read on each operator’s own page before a bet is placed.

BetUK: four tokenised free bets and the football acca inside them

BetUK credits four £10 free bets in two shapes — two are football accumulators that require 4 or more legs, two are multiples of 2 or more selections, all four expiring 7 days after credit, and the qualifying path is a £10 deposit and a sports bet within 7 days of registering with opt-in required. The tokenisation is the point of the offer: the four credits are not interchangeable, so the punter who only wants singles has only two of them to use, while the punter who plays the acca has four. The acca shape raises the floor a single punter cannot reach — a £10 acca at minimum 4 legs and minimum odds on each leg is a different stake to clear than a £10 single — and the punter whose book is singles will leave value on the table.

The licence is held by LeoVegas Gaming PLC and the brand is on the Commission’s register under account 39198. The BetUK domain is the one the Commission’s business-name search returns; a brand holding the licence under one name and trading under another is a separate check the reader does on the register before treating any review as final.

For the punter whose book is football accas, this is a competitive offer: four tokenised credits and a 7-day shelf life give several attempts. For the punter whose book is singles, the offer is half what its headline number says. The same bonus at any other brand with a single-shape credit has the punter spending less to clear it.

Copybet: the boost on the acca rather than the free bet at the door

Copybet’s profile reads as a brand that prices its offers around the accumulator rather than the welcome credit. Its Acca Booster pays up to a 100 per cent cash bonus on accas of 3 or more legs, and the Daily Profit Boost reaches up to 15 per cent on selected markets. The offer is for the punter whose book is combinations; the punter whose book is singles does not see much here. Copybet UK Limited holds account 53774 on the Commission’s register, and the licence is a remote general betting standard licence for real events.

The offer does not state a fixed welcome credit, so what it costs the punter at the door is not pinned down for this brand. That is a gap the reader closes by checking Copybet’s own terms before depositing, and the offer the reader sees there is the offer that applies. A brand without a public welcome number is not a brand with a worse offer — it is a brand with a different shape.

Ladbrokes: BOG, in-play and the Coral sibling

Ladbrokes offers Best Odds Guaranteed on UK and Irish horse races, odds boosts on horse and greyhound bets, in-play betting and Acca Boosts. The welcome structure is left to the reader’s check on Ladbrokes’ own terms. What stands on the page is the racing infrastructure: BOG is a guarantee that pays the higher of the price taken and the starting price, and it is the kind of offer the punter who bets into the racing market uses without thinking, while the punter who never bets racing sees nothing. The licence is account 54743 held by LC International Limited, which also holds the Coral licence, and the reader comparing offers should know that two of the brands in this set are run by the same group; the comparison is between brands, not between companies.

The acca insurance and the odds boost are the offers the punter plays into accas can use. The punter who plays singles does not. That is the trade-off Ladbrokes writes into its offer page, and a punter who bets into racing will find more value here than the punter who does not.

Bet600: five qualifying bets before one free bet credits

Bet600 demands five qualifying single bets of £10 or more at minimum odds 2.0 (Evens) within 7 days of registration, and on settlement credits one £10 free bet. The shape is unusual: most offers in this set ask for one qualifying bet, and the offer’s “free” credit is paid on a wagering pattern. Five £10 singles at minimum evens is £50 of qualifying stake over a week, and the £10 free bet that drops at the end is not paid back if it loses. The punter whose book is a small bet per race on five days of the week will not notice the qualifier; the punter who places one big bet and waits for it to settle will not qualify. Tyche Tech Limited holds the licence under account 44731.

The offer suits a punter who bets regularly rather than a punter who bets once and waits. That is a real distinction: the qualifying pattern is a routing of the offer to active accounts and away from the casual one.

Bet Ahoy: £10 qualifying for a £5 and a £5 credit

Bet Ahoy’s “Bet £10 and Get £10 in Free Bets” splits into a £5 sports bet and a £5 acca. The shape is a half-accas offer: two credits, one of which is single-shaped and one of which is acca-shaped. Bet Ahoy Ltd holds account 100094 on the register, and the licence is remote general betting standard (real events). The offer is modest against the £40 headlines at the top of the set, and that modesty is the cost the punter reads when comparing: a smaller headline is a smaller ask of the qualifying stake, and the offer’s value is closer to the headline than the bigger offers’ value is to theirs.

The split into single and acca is the detail: a punter who plays singles has only half the offer, and a punter who plays accas has the other half. The punter who plays both has the full headline.

Betway: £40 in four tokens, debit card only

Betway credits £40 in four £10 free bet tokens on settlement of a first bet of at least £10 at minimum odds 2.0, and the credit expires after 7 days. The qualifying deposit must be by debit card, not by an e-wallet or bank transfer — a restriction that bites a punter whose funding path is an e-wallet. Betway Limited holds account 39372 on the register.

The £40 headline is large against the £10 offers in this set, and the four-token split keeps the credit on the punter’s side of the table. The minimum odds 2.0 on the qualifying bet is a floor the offer cannot be cleared under, and the debit-card restriction is the real condition: a punter without a debit card cannot use the offer at all.

Fitzwilliam Sports: a closed-membership bookmaker

Fitzwilliam Sports describes itself as a Dublin bookmaker with capped membership, and its welcome is a “High Stakes Welcome” subject to compliance criteria. The shape is not the consumer welcome most of this set is built around — it is the high-stakes, capped-membership shape, where the offer is calibrated to a punter whose stake is several hundred pounds per bet rather than the £10 to £20 shape elsewhere in the set. SBKI Limited holds account 48760 on the register.

For the punter whose book is high stakes, this is a category of offer the rest of the set does not carry. For the punter whose book is recreational, the offer is largely out of reach by design, and the membership cap is the barrier the marketing page does not state.

BetGoodwin: £15 in three shapes

BetGoodwin’s “Bet £10 and Get £15 in Free Bets” splits into a £5 sports bet, a £5 acca and a £5 Sub-Cover bet. The Sub-Cover is the racing-market credit, named for the practice of covering a horse against non-runners; the shape is three tokenised credits across three market types. Goodwin Racing Limited holds account 2927 on the register.

The headline is moderate and the shape is broad. A punter whose book is racing takes one credit, a punter whose book is singles takes another, a punter whose book is accas takes the third. No single punter takes all three, and the headline’s value is shared across the punter’s book rather than concentrated in one market.

LiveScore Bet: the payments lane

LiveScore Bet’s offer does not state a fixed welcome credit. What it does state is the payment set: debit cards (Visa and Mastercard), Apple Pay, PayPal, Pay by Bank (Open Banking) and Revolut Pay. LiveScore Betting and Gaming (Gibraltar) Limited holds account 56859 on the register, and the brand is a UK-licensed remote general betting standard licence.

For a punter whose funding path is Revolut or Open Banking, the payment lane is the offer: many bookmakers in the set do not list those methods, and a punter without a debit card will read this column with more attention than the welcome headline. A punter with a debit card and a settled funding path reads this brand alongside the rest.

Kalooki Sportsbook: instant withdrawals and BOG

Kalooki Sportsbook advertises instant withdrawals by bank transfer within minutes, Best Odds Guaranteed on UK and Irish horse racing, in-play betting, daily boosts and extra place races. Kalooki Sportsbook Limited holds account 57730 on the register, and the licence is remote general betting standard (real events). The brand is operated by Kalooki Sports Book Ltd under company number 12938274.

The withdrawal speed is the offer: a punter who needs the funds back the same day will not find a faster lane in this set. A punter who never withdraws between bets does not notice. The BOG is the racing guarantee the same as elsewhere, and the in-play and daily boosts are the broad-market layer.

The fundaments of the offer: the qualifying bet, the minimum odds, the expiry window

Three numbers determine what the headline credit costs the punter, and they read the same across most of the set. The qualifying bet is the real-money wager that unlocks the credit — £5 at Sky Bet, £10 at most others, £20 at Coral and Unibet, £10 plus five further qualifying bets at Bet600. The minimum odds is the floor on the price that qualifies — 1/2 (1.50) at Spreadex, 2.0 (1/1) at Coral, Unibet and Betway, 3.0 at SBK, with several offers not stating the floor and leaving it to the reader to check. The expiry is the shelf life on the credit once issued — 7 days is the standard, 48 hours on the SBK credit, with no offer in this set standing longer.

The trade-off is between a low qualifying stake and a higher minimum odds (Sky Bet’s 5p at 1/1 unlocks £30 in credits), and a higher qualifying stake and a lower minimum odds (Coral’s £20 at 1/1 unlocks £40 in credits). The headline number is one number; the package is three. A punter who compares on the headline alone reads the set in the wrong order.

The expiry is where most credits die. Seven days from issue is a working week; a punter who is busy through the weekend and has the credit live on a Monday morning has used one day of seven. A credit that dies unused is a credit whose headline value is zero to the punter, and the marketing line does not mention it.

Statutes and jurisdiction: what the Commission’s rules do to a welcome offer

The Gambling Act 2005 and the Commission’s LCCP are the frame every UK-licensed welcome offer sits inside, and the rules the reader should know are first read on the brand’s own terms page. The 19 January 2026 promotion rules cap the wagering multiple on a bonus at 10x and ban an offer that asks the punter to gamble on two or more product types — betting and casino, betting and bingo, betting and lottery — in a single trigger. The reader who sees an offer that bundles free spins into a sports-betting trigger has been shown an offer that is no longer permitted, and the brand is one the reader should re-check on the register.

The remote betting licence categories — remote general betting standard (real events), remote general betting standard (virtual events), remote general betting limited, remote pool betting and remote betting intermediary — are the licences the Commission issues for betting online, and a brand whose licence is not one of those is not licensed to take a UK sports bet online. The Commission’s public register is the test, and the reader who searches by business name, trading name, domain or account number finds the truth the headline does not state. Several brands run under one licensee in this set — Ladbrokes and Coral under LC International Limited — so the comparison between them is a comparison of brands, not companies, and the offer the punter takes is the offer the brand states, not the offer the licensee states.

The 9pm watershed on TV advertising and the front-of-shirt withdrawal the Premier League clubs have agreed from 2026/27 are not statute; they are industry rules and voluntary agreements, and they change the picture a punter sees on a screen, not the laws the offer sits inside.

The calculation: what a £40 free bet at minimum odds 2.0 is really worth

The calculation the spec names is the bonus-turnover calculation, and it is built around the wagering multiple of 10x in force since 19 January 2026. The example offer is the kind of welcome several of the brands in this set run: a £40 free bet credit at 2.0 minimum odds, and a turnover rule that asks for the qualifying stake to be placed a fixed number of times before the credit clears. The arithmetic in this section turns the headline into the number a punter can compare against the £40 in their wallet, and the figure is a band because the calculation assumes only the qualifying stake is wagered and the punter does not run a smaller bet through the same offer.

The qualifying bet at minimum odds 2.0 on a market with 5 per cent margin pays back the stake with a small loss on average — for a £10 qualifying bet at 2.0, the expected cost of the qualifying wager is £0.50. The £40 free bet, used at the same odds, pays back an expected real-money value of around £19 — the calculation of stake × (odds − 1) ÷ odds × payout share, where payout share is the inverse of the margin, gives 40 × (2.0 − 1) ÷ 2.0 × 0.95 = £19. The qualifying stake costs £10 and clears £40 of credit, and the cost of the qualifying wager is £0.50.

The total expected value is around £18.50: the £19 of expected real-money return on the free bet, less the £0.50 expected cost of the qualifying wager. That is the band the calculation lands on, and the band is £17 to £20 depending on the market margin and the minimum odds on the free bet. A punter who uses the free bet at minimum odds 1.5 instead of 2.0 sees the expected value fall to around £12.70 — the floor on the credit compresses the value, and the headline number does not change. A punter who uses the credit at minimum odds 3.0 sees the value rise to around £25.30 — a higher floor raises the value, and again the headline does not change.

The 10x wagering cap does not affect this calculation because the offer is a free bet whose stake is not returned — the cap applies to bonuses with a wagering requirement, not to free bets in this clean form. A brand whose offer is a cash bonus at 10x of £40, on the other hand, asks the punter for £400 of qualifying bets before the bonus drops, and the expected cost of clearing that turnover on a 5 per cent margin market is £20 — meaning the punter is paying £20 in margin to clear a £40 bonus, and the bonus is worth £20 on average, which is exactly what the cap allows and not more. That is the line the Commission’s rule draws: a £40 bonus can never cost the punter more than £20 to clear, but a £40 bonus cannot be made worth more than £20 to the punter either, because the rule that protects the punter is the same rule that caps the headline.

The number the punter reads off the page is the difference between the headline and the value. For a £40 free bet at minimum odds 2.0 on a market with 5 per cent margin, the headline is £40 and the value is £19, and the gap is the cost of the offer being what it is. For a £40 cash bonus at 10x turnover on the same market, the headline is £40 and the value is £20 after clearing, and the gap is the same shape from a different angle. The reader who wants a bigger headline has to clear a bigger turnover, and the rule that protects against a bigger turnover is the same rule that caps the headline a brand can offer.

The legality and protection frame a punter carries

The frame is part of the offer, and a punter who reads only the headline reads the offer without its frame. The credit-card ban in force since 14 April 2020 means a punter cannot fund a wager — including a free bet — with a credit card, including through an e-wallet; the offer at Betway that names debit card deposits only is one expression of the same rule. The financial vulnerability check at £150 net deposits in a rolling 30 days means the punter who has wagered more than £150 in net terms in a month is on the operator’s check list, and the check is a public-record look-up rather than a credit reference. The financial risk assessment the press calls affordability checks has been announced in a staged plan with no start date, and is not in force as a hard threshold yet; a punter who reads an article that states the checks are live has read a future tense written as a present one.

GAMSTOP is the lever for the punter who decides the offer is the wrong offer to take. The registration is at gamstop.co.uk and the period is six months, one year, five years, or five years with auto-renewal; the exclusion then stays for a further seven years unless the punter asks GAMSTOP to remove it. Once registered, the punter cannot open a new account at any UK-licensed online bookmaker for the chosen period, and the existing accounts are closed. The punter who is considering the offers on this page and is worried about the shape of their betting is the punter GAMSTOP is built for.

The complaints route for the punter who has a dispute with a UK-licensed bookmaker is the Commission, through the operator first and the approved dispute-resolution body if the operator does not resolve. The punter who bets with an unlicensed brand has no Commission route and no approved ADR — the brand is bound only by its own terms and the law of the jurisdiction it sits in, and the loss of the British route is the cost the marketing line of an unlicensed brand does not state.

Side-by-side: where each brand fits in the comparison

The brands sit in three groups on the comparison the spec asks for. The first group carries a £30 to £40 free bet credit at minimum odds 2.0 with a 7-day expiry and no casino bundled in — Coral, Unibet, Betway, Spreadex — and is the group the headline reader is comparing against. The second group carries a smaller credit in tokenised form, often split between singles and accas, with a 7-day expiry and no casino bundled in — BetUK, Bet Ahoy, BetGoodwin, Bet600 — and is the group the punter whose book is a particular market shape looks at. The third group carries no fixed welcome credit and is compared on the offer it does state — Copybet on acca boosts, Ladbrokes on racing infrastructure, Fitzwilliam on high-stakes membership, LiveScore Bet on the payment lane, Kalooki Sportsbook on withdrawal speed.

The shape of the offer is the comparison, not the headline. A punter whose book is singles reads the first group for the biggest headline credit and the second group for the credit that fits the singles shape; a punter whose book is accas reads the first group for the headline and Copybet for the boost; a punter whose book is racing reads Ladbrokes and Kalooki Sportsbook for BOG and the racing infrastructure; a punter whose book is high stakes reads Fitzwilliam for the membership-shape offer; a punter whose book is Revolut reads LiveScore Bet for the funding lane.

The offers sit on the same register, and the register is the test. A brand whose licence number is on the table above is the brand the punter can complain to through the Commission; a brand whose licence is not on the table is a brand the punter checks before staking.

The market’s own terms: minimum odds, stake limits and the punters’ habits

The minimum odds on a free bet is the lever the offer is calibrated to. A floor at 2.0 means the free bet pays back approximately the free-bet stake when it wins, and the punter who uses the credit at 2.0 sees the headline roughly halved; a floor at 1.5 means the credit pays back half its stake when it wins, and the headline is roughly quartered. The marketing line states the credit; the minimum odds states the value, and the punter who reads both reads the offer.

Stake limits are set by the operator and not by statute. A punter whose bet is at the upper end of an operator’s stake range finds the bet reduced or refused without notice, and the offer’s headline is unaffected by the limit; the offer is paid on the stake the operator accepts, not on the stake the punter wanted to place. This is the case at most UK-licensed brands for high-profile events and on each-way bets at racing meetings with a large field.

The punters’ habits the offers target are two. The first is the regular small-stake punter whose book is several £10 bets a week across a single sport — racing, football, a Premier League acca — and the offer the brand writes for this punter is a tokenised free bet on the sport the punter plays. The second is the high-stakes punter whose book is one or two large bets a week, and the offer the brand writes for this punter is the high-stakes welcome at Fitzwilliam and the kinds of offers whose headline number is several hundred pounds. The bookmaker’s marketing is built around these two shapes, and a punter who sits between them reads an offer that was not written for them.

How the offer is read in practice

A punter who wants to compare reads four things in this order. First, the licence — on the Commission’s public register by brand name or domain, against a remote general betting licence for real events, and on the GAMSTOP member list by inference from the licence. Second, the qualifying path — the real-money bet that unlocks the credit, its minimum odds, its expiry window. Fourth, the credit itself — the headline number, the tokenisation, the expiry on the credit, the minimum odds on the credit, and whether the stake is returned.

A punter who reads only the headline reads one number. A punter who reads the four reads the offer, and the offer is what the marketing line describes — at the price the qualifying path and the credit’s terms charge.

The frame the punter carries is the responsible gambling frame: the verification before the first bet, the vulnerability check at £150 net deposits, the GAMSTOP lever at any time, and the help outside the operator at GamCare and the National Gambling Helpline. The offer is what the headline says, and the frame is what the headline does not say, and the punter’s comparison is the two together.

Frequently asked questions about UK existing customer offers

What is the maximum wagering requirement on a betting bonus in Great Britain?

Since 19 January 2026 the Gambling Commission has capped the wagering requirement on a betting bonus at 10 times the bonus amount. A £40 bonus at the cap is £400 of qualifying bets before the bonus drops into a withdrawable balance, and no offer can ask the punter for more. The cap applies to cash bonuses and similar, and it does not erase the turnover — it sets a ceiling on it.

What do minimum odds and the wagering requirement mean in a sign-up offer?

Minimum odds is the floor on the price a qualifying bet must clear to count towards the bonus turnover — most offers in this set sit at 1/2 (1.50) or 2.0 (1/1). The wagering requirement is the multiple of the bonus the qualifying bets must add up to. A bonus of £30 at 5x turnover is £150 of qualifying bets; the punter who places the bets at odds below the floor finds them excluded from the turnover and has to replace them.

Why is the stake of a free bet not paid back with the winnings?

A free bet is a credit that the operator stakes on the punter’s behalf, and the stake is the operator’s money. The winnings are paid in real money but the stake is removed if the bet loses; the punter who backs a winner at 5.0 on a £10 free bet sees £40 in real money, not £50. The convention is what turns the headline credit into the value the calculation section exercises, and the rule is on every operator’s own terms page.

Can a bet on sport be tied to a casino bonus under the Commission’s promotion rules?

No. Since 19 January 2026 mixed-product promotions — an offer that asks the punter to gamble on two or more product types such as betting and casino, betting and bingo, or betting and lottery — are banned. A welcome offer whose trigger is a sports bet cannot credit free spins, casino bonus funds or lottery entries; the casino and lottery offers, if any, must be earned on their own terms in their own product.

How can it be checked that a bookmaker holds a Gambling Commission licence?

The Commission’s public register lets the punter search by business name, trading name, domain or account number. The search returns the licence categories and the licence holder; a brand whose search does not return a remote general betting licence for real events is not licensed to take a UK sports bet online. The punter who checks before depositing closes the gap the marketing line leaves open.

Are betting winnings taxed in Great Britain, and who pays General Betting Duty?

The punter pays no tax on betting winnings in Great Britain. General Betting Duty is the operator’s tax on gross profits, currently 15 per cent, with a remote betting rate of 25 per cent applying from 1 April 2027 within it on bets that are not on UK horse racing, self-service betting terminals, pool betting or in-person betting. The duty is the operator’s; the punter does not see it on the betting slip.

Content created by the «Free bets» team